
FeasiBuild vs the Market in 2026
Direct answer: The 2026 feasibility-software market splits along two axes: traditional versus AI-powered, and enterprise pricing versus professional pricing. ARGUS and EstateMaster anchor the traditional-enterprise corner ($500–$3,000/mo); AIRE Software prices like a consultant (~$7K per study); an AI wave (Feasibility.pro, Buildora IQ, Feasly, Archistar) occupies subscriptions from ~$49 to ~$99/mo. FeasiBuild sits in the AI column on a different economic model — $99 lifetime access plus per-report credits, no subscription — and its payment-structure engine covers any market on earth: native presets for Dubai Law No. 8, Malaysia HDA and Australia's 10/90, plus configurable rules (no escrow, custom progress splits like 20/80 or 30/70, staged escrow with custom retention) selected by pin-drop in any country.
1. The positioning map
| Price band | Traditional | AI-powered |
|---|---|---|
| High | ARGUS · EstateMaster ($500–$3K/mo) | AIRE Software (~$7K/study) |
| Mid | — | Feasibility.pro ($99/mo) · Buildora IQ ($69/mo) |
| Low | Archistar Basic (~$63/mo) | Feasly ($49/mo) |
| Different model | — | FeasiBuild: $99 lifetime + per-report credits |
Read the map this way: everything above charges you forever. FeasiBuild charges you once, then per use.
2. Head-to-head, named
FeasiBuild vs ARGUS / EstateMaster. The enterprise incumbents: deep configuration, decades of track record, quote-based licensing, real implementation projects and training curves. Payment-structure rules — escrow releases, progress percentages, retentions — are manual configuration, not engine logic; AI market research is not in the box. They win: large teams with IT and procurement. FeasiBuild wins: any professional who needs committee-grade output this week, approved on a credit card.
FeasiBuild vs AIRE Software. At roughly $7,000 per study, that's consultant economics with software branding. FeasiBuild's lifetime access costs about 1.4% of one such study — before credits. They win: mandated, fully managed engagements. FeasiBuild wins: everyone with a pipeline and a pulse.
FeasiBuild vs Feasibility.pro ($99/mo). The closest mirror price — monthly. Twelve months of their Pro equals twelve FeasiBuild lifetime accesses. Beyond pricing: check payment-structure configurability, export/ownership and where your data lives before choosing either. They win: teams preferring opex billing. FeasiBuild wins: ownership, lifetime economics, zero-knowledge design.
FeasiBuild vs Buildora IQ ($69/mo) & Feasly ($49/mo). Capable entry-level AI proforma tools for standard assets. The gaps that matter at committee level: a configurable payment-structure engine (escrow presets, custom splits, staged retentions), correlated downside shocks, and a bankable 30+ slide document rather than a dashboard. They win: light, frequent screening. FeasiBuild wins: anything that must survive a credit committee.
FeasiBuild vs Archistar (from ~$63/mo). Strong Australian generative site-planning and planning-feasibility angle. FeasiBuild goes deeper on the development-finance engine and works in any market via pin-drop — our own sample library spans a Malaysia warehouse, a UAE hotel and a China residential high-rise. They win: AU site-feasibility visuals. FeasiBuild wins: cross-border development finance.
3. What a year actually costs
| Tool | 2 studies/yr | 6 studies/yr | 24 studies/yr |
|---|---|---|---|
| ARGUS / EstateMaster | $6K–36K (licence anyway) | same | same + support |
| AIRE Software | ~$14K | ~$42K | not viable |
| Feasibility.pro | $1,188 | $1,188 | $1,188 (capacity limits apply) |
| Buildora IQ / Feasly | $828 / $588 | same | same |
| FeasiBuild | $99 + 2 credits | $99 + 6 credits | Unlimited pack $2,400 |
Subscriptions price your quiet quarters too. Lifetime + per-report prices only your work.
4. The three moats, stated plainly
- Payment-structure-native, everywhere. Pin-drop sets the country. Native presets handle Dubai Law No. 8, Malaysia HDA and Australia's 10/90 automatically; every other market gets the configurable engine — no escrow, custom progress splits, staged escrow with custom retention — with AI market research tuned to the pin-dropped location, falling back to the nearest city when hyper-local data is thin.
- Zero-knowledge by design — your data encrypted in your own Puter cloud; you choose the AI engine.
- Ownership economics — $99 lifetime, exportable models, white-label output.
5. Where FeasiBuild is not the right choice
Bespoke JV promote waterfalls (Excel still rules) · formal valuations (licensed valuers only) · trophy-market local depth (verify with brokers) · enterprises needing vendor SLAs and on-prem deployment.
Run one real past deal through the free Explorer tier and judge the exported report — not this page, not any page.
Footnote: Competitor pricing and features as publicly listed, September 2026, simplified for comparison; verify directly with each vendor.
Related reading
Best Feasibility Study Software in 2026
What to score when you compare feasibility tools this year: asset-class engines, jurisdiction depth, scenario speed, privacy, and whether the deck is an export of the model or a weekend in PowerPoint.
AI vs Excel for Real Estate Proformas
Excel is still the language of underwriting. The question is whether your proforma is a living engine or a weekend of versioned workbooks. Where AI helps — and where it must not invent numbers.
AI Tools for Real Estate Underwriting
Chatbots write memos. Underwriting tools have to sit on a constrained financial engine. What to look for in AI for development appraisal in 2026 — research, scenarios, privacy, and an exportable IC pack.